Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.spab.ac.in:80/handle/123456789/1934
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLandge, Amit Prakash-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T11:28:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-11T11:28:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.spab.ac.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/1934-
dc.description.abstractTrends in growth of cities towards the periphery with economic, real estate and many other influencing opportunities has created a demand for infill development of existing urban fabric and changes in spatial structures with different intents such as re densification, new commercial or leisure centric opportunities, conservation, etc. This venture towards infill development neglects the shape and urban form this transformation is producing, which eventually is seen to become a threat towards the urbanity of these emerging localities. Urban vitality, a significant component of urbanity is composed of economic, social and cultural vitality manifested spatially. Which is associated with the existing settlement and the urban form of older (once prominent) parts of cities. Robustness & spatially manifested vitality is often being neglected in the top – down process of regional/ urban planning to local area planning. Localities promoted for infill development are often places with prominence; socio culturally or economically, with a rigid structure of various active spatial networks which keep these localities up and running while cities transform. But insertion of infill development disregards the quality of urban form and associated human activities and patterns, builds indifferent urban form conforming to the traditional spatial practices of segregation and enclave urbanism. While it is argued that urban features in residential development promote or limit the urban vitality, there is a lack of research on the level of urban vitality of infill development in urban structures at the scale of urban blocks The study carried out in this thesis intends to analyse the relationship between the urbanity, urban form and interdependency of both on each other, to understand the changes in urban form initiated due to infill development and how it affects the urbanity and vitality of the localities from block to neighbourhood levels. This thesis will also enquire how quality of urban form can modulate the vitality and robustness of development keeping in mind the social, economic and spatial aspects. This thesis ultimately aims to enhance the spatial quality of built environment in cases of infill development, structurally on different scales and for different stakeholders for a robust and liveable interface between the built and unbuilt and also to prepare a comprehensive redevelopment guideline keeping in mind the coherent vitality of user experience towards the urban form.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPA Bhopalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2020MUD023;TH001590-
dc.subjectSpatial integrationsen_US
dc.subjectCentral Mumbaien_US
dc.subjectCentral Mumbaien_US
dc.subjectLower parelen_US
dc.subjectEconomyen_US
dc.subjectImagining Vitalisationen_US
dc.subjectTypologyen_US
dc.titleImagining vitalisation of infill development with spatial integrations: case of lower parel Central Mumbai/ Amit Prakash Landge; under the guidance of Karna Senguptaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Master of Architecture (Urban Design)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Amit_2020MUD023 FINAL.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.